Trump Claims He Will Pardon Convicted Colorado Clerk, But Legal Experts Say He Can’t

In a surprising announcement, former President Donald Trump stated that he intends to pardon Tina Peters, a former elections clerk in Colorado who was convicted of tampering with voting equipment. However, legal experts clarify that Trump’s presidential powers do not extend to state crimes, meaning Peters’ conviction—and her nine-year sentence—remains unaffected.

Why It Matters

This situation highlights an ongoing national debate around election integrity, voter fraud claims, and the extent of presidential powers. The case of Tina Peters, who has gained notoriety as a proponent of unfounded election fraud theories, brings to the forefront questions about state versus federal jurisdiction in matters of criminal justice.

Key Developments

• Tina Peters was convicted in 2024 in a Colorado state court for tampering with election equipment.
• Colorado’s Governor Jared Polis and Secretary of State Jena Griswold have stated that Trump lacks jurisdiction over state crimes.
• Peters’ defense has argued that her actions were justified under the belief that she was preserving election records.
• Her appeal is set for oral arguments in January.

Full Report

Presidential Pardon Announcement

Trump’s claim of intent to pardon Peters has raised eyebrows and garnered responses from Colorado officials. In a statement, Governor Jared Polis emphasized that the former president has no authority to intervene in state legal matters, reiterating that Peters’ case is one for the courts to resolve. Secretary of State Jena Griswold condemned Trump’s remarks, labeling them as a "lawless intrusion on states’ rights."

Peters’ Case Details

At 70 years old, Peters served as a Republican county clerk in Mesa County, Colorado. Her legal troubles began months after the 2020 presidential election, amid rampant, unfounded allegations that the election had been rigged. Peters allowed an unauthorized individual to access Dominion voting machines, claiming this was part of her search for evidence of voter fraud. Last year, she faced multiple felony and misdemeanor charges as a result of her actions.

Defense and Reactions

Peters maintains that her activities were within the bounds of her responsibilities as a county clerk. Her legal representation, including attorney Peter Ticktin—a longtime associate of Trump—has argued that her case should have considered various federal laws, claiming that the judicial process was weaponized against her due to her political affiliations.

Ticktin insists that Peters is a proud American who stands by her actions, contending she is not guilty of crimes but rather a patriotic individual fighting for what she believes in.

Next Steps for Peters

The legal journey for Peters is far from over. Following her conviction, an appeal is in progress, with oral arguments scheduled for January. Notably, the U.S. Department of Justice has requested that she be moved to federal custody for security reasons, a request that the state government has denied.

Context & Previous Events

Peters’ conviction stems from her actions taken in the wake of the 2020 presidential election, which Trump lost amid widespread allegations of voter fraud that were ultimately deemed baseless. The controversy surrounding her case underscores a larger narrative about the consequences of promoting unfounded theories of election misconduct and the political divisions that have emerged as a result.