Turning Point USA Chapter Denied Again at Loyola University New Orleans

A second attempt by a chapter of Turning Point USA to gain registered student organization status at Loyola University New Orleans was thwarted by the student government on Wednesday night. The decision comes despite a recent court ruling that previously favored the conservative group, raising questions about political bias and organizational transparency within the student government.

Why It Matters

The situation at Loyola highlights ongoing tensions between conservative and progressive student organizations on college campuses. The repeated denial of Turning Point USA’s application has sparked significant controversy, drawing attention from political leaders and raising concerns about the principles of free speech and fair representation in student governance.

Key Developments

• Second Denial: The Loyola University student government denied Turning Point USA’s application for registered student organization status for a second time, following an appeal that had previously favored the group.

• No Transparency: The student government has yet to provide a rationale for the denial, prompting claims of political motivations from students involved in the appeal process.

• Appeal Process: Loyola law student Ethan Estis, who guided the undergraduate Turning Point members during their appeal, expressed skepticism about the student government’s adherence to procedural rules.

• Public Reaction: A demonstration took place outside the meeting, where Turning Point supporters and protesters clashed in opinions over the conservative group’s presence on campus.

Full Report

Denial Overview

Turning Point USA, a national conservative organization, faced its second rejection from the student government at Loyola University New Orleans after a previous court of review ruling favored the group’s appeal. The student government first denied the application in October, stating a need for greater scrutiny, but has not publicly explained its continued opposition.

Meeting Procedures in Question

Ethan Estis, a law student at Loyola and advisor to the Turning Point members, criticized the student government for its purported selective enforcement of rules. He noted discrepancies related to maintaining fire marshal capacity during meetings, suggesting the government acted to impede attendance on purpose. "It was clear they aimed to follow and use the rules to their benefit," he remarked.

Concerns also arose during the meeting as an SGA member sought to limit attendance to undergraduate students only—contrary to public access policies. This further fueled accusations of inappropriate governance from Estis and supporters of Turning Point USA.

Reaction from Political Figures

The Louisiana GOP responded strongly to the chapter’s ongoing struggles, publicly supporting the group and labeling the denials as instances of "injustice." GOP Chairman Derek Babcock vowed to assist the Turning Point members in addressing what he called a systematic bias within the student government.

Protest Outside Meeting

As the meeting unfolded, a group of around 30 Turning Point supporters gathered in prayer outside the building, which was met by protesters displaying various signs, including negative sentiments toward the conservative organization. The atmosphere highlighted the divisiveness surrounding campus political affiliations and student representation.

Context & Previous Events

The student chapter of Turning Point USA first faced rejection from the Loyola student government on October 15, 2025, igniting an outcry from conservative students and political entities in Louisiana. Following the chapter’s successful appeal to the court of review, which cited procedural irregularities, the situation returned to the student government for final consideration, resulting in this latest denial. Estis indicated that there are no further avenues for appeal, raising the stakes for students seeking organizational recognition.